Skip to main content

Table 4 Intraprocedural and post-procedural aspect during intervention

From: Long-term follow-up of therapeutic efficacy of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold in comparison to everolimus-eluting stent in treatment of chronic total occlusion guided by intracoronary imaging

PCI

DES group

Absorb group

Test

p value

Sig.

No. = 40

No. = 20

Artery

LAD

18 (45.0%)

9 (45.0%)

0.000a

1.000

NS

RCA

18 (45.0%)

9 (45.0%)

LCX

4 (10.0%)

2 (10.0%)

Antegrade or retrograde

Antegrade

30 (75.0%)

15 (75.0%)

0.000a

1.000

NS

Retrograde

10 (25.0%)

5 (25.0%)

J score

Median (IQR)

3 (3 – 4)

3 (3–4)

− 0.679c

0.497

NS

Range

3–4

2–4

Pre-dilatation

Done

40 (100.0%)

20 (100.0%)

–

–

–

Post-dilatation

Not done

2 (5.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1.034a

0.309

NS

Done

38 (95.0%)

20 (100.0%)

Stent length

Mean ± SD

32.53 ± 9.46

29.40 ± 8.61

1.242b

0.219

NS

Range

15–48

18–38

DAPT

Given

40 (100.0%)

20 (100.0%)

–

–

–

TIMI flow intraprocedure

II

2 (5.0%)

0 (0.0%)

1.034a

0.309

NS

III

38 (95.0%)

20 (100.0%)

Coronary perforation

occurred

0 (0%)

1 (0.05%)

0.000a

1.000

NS

  1. NS non-significant, S significant
  2. aChi-square test
  3. bIndependent t test
  4. cMann-Whitney test