From: The role of optical coherence tomography guidance in scaffold versus stent optimization
Modifications | BRS (n = 245) | DES (n = 82) | p value |
---|---|---|---|
No. (%) | No. (%) | ||
Total modifications | 117 (47.6) | 27 (32.9) | 0.019 |
Post-dilatation due to underexpansion or malapposition | 90 (36.7) | 26 (31.7) | 0.410 |
Dissection stenting | 16 (6.5) | 1 (1.2) | 0.060 |
Stenting due to underexpansion | 2 (0.8) | 0 (0.0) | 0.411 |
Fracture stenting | 4 (1.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0.576 |
Thrombus aspiration | 1 (0.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0.562 |
Thrombus stenting | 1 (0.4) | 0 (0.0) | 0.562 |
Residual lesion stenting | 3 (1.2) | 0 (0.0) | 0.576 |