Skip to main content

Table 4 Distributions of guidewire type, number, and brands according to crossability of initial choice guidewire

From: Rational guidewire use in the coronary chronic total occlusion interventions

Variables

Same initial-final guidewire (+)

Same initial-final guidewire (−)

p

Initial guidewire type

  

< 0.001

 Polymeric

82.1% (64)

55.6% (55)

 

 Non-polymeric

17.9% (14)

44.4% (44)

 

Initial guidewire stiffness

  

0.07

 Soft (< 1 g)

28.2% (22)

35.4% (35)

 

 Moderate (1–9 g)

64.1% (50)

48.5% (48)

 

 Stiff (≥ 9 g)

7.7% (6)

16.2% (16)

 

Guidewire number

  

< 0.001

 1–3

82.1% (64)

20.2% (20)

 

 4–6

15.4% (12)

53.5% (53)

 

 7–10

2.6% (2)

20.2% (20)

 

≥ 10

0% (0)

3.4% (6)

 

Guidewire brand

  

0.005

 Fielder FC

1.3% (1)

7.1% (7)

 

 Fielder XT

20.5% (16)

14.1% (14)

 

 Fielder XT-A

1.3% (1)

3.0% (3)

 

 Fielder XT-R

5.1% (4)

1.0% (1)

 

 Miracle 3

1.3% (1)

1.0% (1)

 

 Miracle 6

3.8% (3)

6.1% (6)

 

 Miracle 12

0% (0)

0% (0)

 

 Pilot 50

20.5% (16)

12.1% (12)

 

 Pilot 150

1.3% (1)

0% (0)

 

 Pilot 200

30.8% (24)

11.1% (11)

 

 Gaia 1

0 % (0)

1.0% (1)

 

 Gaia 2

1.3% (1)

1.0% (1)

 

 Gaia 3

0% (0)

1.0% (1)

 

 Confianza 9

7.7% (6)

14.1% (14)

 

 Sion

1.3% (1)

9.1% (9)

 

 Sion black

0% (0)

0% (0)

 

 Ultimate 3

2.6% (2)

10.1% (10)

 

 PT 2

0% (0)

4.0% (4)

 

 Gladius

1.3% (1)

3.0% (3)

 

 Progress 200

0% (0)

1.0% (1)

 

Total

44.1% (78)

55.9% (99)

 
  1. P < 0.05 is indicated as significant