Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of major randomized controlled trials on angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor

From: Will introduction of ARNI reduce the need of device therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction?

Trial

Intervention

Comparator

Inclusion criteria

Primary endpoints

Outcomes

PARADIFM-HF (2014)

(n = 8399)

F/up 27 months

Sacubitril/vvalsartan

Enalapril

-LVRF ≤ 35

-NYHA classes II–IV

-Elevated NP

Composite of CVD or HF hospitalization

Primary endpoint

HR = 0.80 (0.73–0.87)

P = 0.0000002

CVD

HR = 0.80 (0.71–0.89)

P = 0.00004

All-cause mortality

HR = 0.84 (0.76–0.93)

P < 0.0001

Symptomatic hypotension (14% vs 9.2%; P < 0.001)

TITRATION (2016)

(n = 498)

F/up 12 weeks

Condensed regimen (full dose of ARNI by 3 weeks)

Comparator regimen (full dose of ARNI by 6 weeks)

LVEF ≤ 35%

NYHA classes II–IV

Adverse events (hypotension, renal dysfunction, hyperkalemia, angioedema)

No significant difference

PIONEER-HF (2019)

(n = 881)

F/up 8 weeks

Sacubitril/valsartan

Enalapril

LVEF ≤ 40%

Elevated NP

Hospitalized for ADHF

Time-averaged change of NT-proBNP

Primary endpoint

HR 0.71 (0.63–0.81), P < 0.05

HF rehospitalization 8.0 % vs. 13.8%, P < 0.05

PARAMOUNT (2012)

(n = 301)

F/up 12 weeks

Sacubitril/valsartan

Valsartan

LVEF ≥45%

NYHA classes II–III

Elevated NP

Change in NT-pro BNP from baseline

Significant change in favor of ARNI:

Ratio 0.77 (0.64–0.92)

PARAGON-HF (2019)

(n = 4822)

F/up 35 months

Sacubitril/valsartan

Valsartan

LVEF ≥ 45%

NYHA classes II–III

Elevated NP

Composite of HF hospitalizations and CVDs

Non-significant

Relative risk 0.87 (0.75–1.01)

EVALUATE-HF (2019)

(n = 464)

F/up 12 weeks

Sacubitril/valsartan

Enalapril

LVEF ≤40%

NYHA classes I–III

History of hypertension

Aortic characteristic impedance (Zc)

Non-significant difference in two groups

PRIME (2019)

(n = 118)

F/up 12 months

Sacubitril/valsartan

Valsartan

LVEF 25–50%

NYHA classes I–III

Chronic functional MR (EROA >  0.1 cm2 despite optimal medical therapy)

Change in EROA

Significant decrease in EROA (∇ 0.04cm2), regurgitant volume (∇ 7.3 ml), LVEDVI (∇ 7.01 ml)

PROVE-HF (2019)

(n = 794)

F/up 12 months

Sacubitril/valsartan

ACEi/ARB

LVEF ≤ 40%

NYHA II–IV

Correlation between change in NT-pro BNP and remodeling (LVEF, LVEDVi, LVESVi, LAVi, E/E/e' at 12 months

Significant correlations observed between the change in NT-proBNP concentration and all cardiac remodeling parameters

  1. ACEi Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, ADHF Acute decompensated heart failure, ARB Angiotensin receptor blocker, ARNI Angiotensin receptor neprolysin inhibitor, CV Cardiovascular, CVD Cardiovascular death, E/e' Ratio of early mitral diastolic filling velocity/early diastolic mitral annular velocity, EROA Effective regurgitant orifice area, EVALUATE-HF Effect of Sacubitril-Valsartan Versus Enalapril on Aortic Stiffness in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction, F/up Follow-up, HF Heart failure, HR Hazard ratio, LAVi Left atrial volume index, LVEDVi LV end-diastolic volume index, LVEF Left ventricular ejection fraction, LVESVi LV end-systolic volume index, MR Mitral regurgitation, NP Natriuretic peptide, NT-proBNP N-terminal-pro B-type NP, NYHA New York Heart Association, PARADIGM-HF Prospective comparison of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI) with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure, PARAGON-HF Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ARB Global Outcomes in HF With Preserved Ejection Fraction, PARAMOUNT Prospective comparison of ARNI with ARB on Management Of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, PIONEER-HF Comparison of Sacubitril-Valsartan versus Enalapril on Effect on NT-proBNP in Patients Stabilized from an Acute Heart Failure Episode, PRIME Pharmacological Reduction of Functional, Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation, PROVE-HF Prospective Study of Biomarkers, Symptom Improvement and Ventricular Remodeling During Entresto Therapy for Heart Failure, RFT Renal function test, ∇ Change