Skip to main content
The Egyptian Heart Journal

Table 5 Comparison between the different studied types of management according to different pre and in-hospital delay times

From: Management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in comparison to European society of cardiology guidelines in Alexandria University Hospitals, Egypt

 

Total (n = 436)

PCI (n = 280)

Thrombolytic (n = 32)

Conservative (n = 124)

Pre-hospital delay (min)

 Mean ± SD

629.0 ± 796.7

316.9 ± 167.6

291.9 ± 126.7

1420.9 ± 1137.3

 Median (IQR)

360 (240–600)

290 (180–420)

240 (195–360)

920 (570–1800)

ER delay (min)

 Mean ± SD

48.24 ± 89.30

39 ± 23.49

27.81 ± 10.16

74.38 ± 161.0

 Median (IQR)

40 (30–52.5)

35 (30–45)

30 (20–30)

59 (40–60)

CCU delay

 Mean ± SD

 

53.86 ± 49

–

–

 Median (IQR)

 

40 (30–60)

–

–

Pre-hospital delay (min)

 Mean ± SD

629.0 ± 796.7

316.9 ± 167.6

291.9 ± 126.7

1420.9 ± 1137.3

 Median (IQR)

360 (240–600)

290 (180–420)

240 (195–360)

920 (570–1800)

ER delay (min)

 Mean ± SD

48.24 ± 89.30

39 ± 23.49

27.81 ± 10.16

74.38 ± 161.0

 Median (IQR)

40 (30–52.5)

35 (30–45)

30 (20–30)

59 (40–60)

CCU delay

 Mean ± SD

 

53.86 ± 49

–

–

 Median (IQR)

 

40 (30–60)

–

–

  1. Tables 4 and 5 compare different types of management studied in this research based on risk factors and Killip Class on presentation and pre- and in-hospital delay times, respectively
Back to article page