Skip to main content

Table 1 Studies main characteristics

From: Left atrial appendage morphofunctional indices could be predictive of arrhythmia recurrence post-atrial fibrillation ablation: a meta-analysis

Author/Year

Country

Study type

N

AFCA type

AF type

FU

Age (years)

Female (%)

HF (%)

LAA indices

Tsao [16]

Taiwan

R

68

RF

PAF, Per-AF

228 ± 79 d

53.3 ± 9.0

23.5

N/R

LAAEF

Park [27]

Korea

R

264

RF

PAF, Per-AF

33.2 ± 12.4 mo

54.8 ± 10.8

19.7

16.28

LAAV

LAAEF

Machino-Ohtsuka [38]

Japan

R

123

RF

Per-AF

18 ± 2.3 mo

60 ± 9

15

N/R

LAAeV

Yoshida [43]

Japan

R

67

RF

PAF, Per-AF

6 mo

64 ± 8

13.43

N/R

LAAeV

Combes [44]

France

P

40

RF

Per-AF

12 mo

60 ± 11

15

N/R

LAAeV

Kim 2014

Korea

R

130

RF

Per-AF

33 mo (24–52)+

54.6 ± 9.3

13.84

30

LAAEF

Gerede [45]

Turkey

P

51

CB

PAF

12mo

54.6 ± 10.4

50.9

23.5

LAAeV

Fukushima [46]

Japan

P

105

RF

PAF

19 mo( 6–38)+

57 ± 12

23.5

N/R

LAAeV

Ariyama [47]

Japan

R

41

RF

NPAF

12 mo

58 ± 10

7

9.75

LAAeV

Ma [48]

China

P

120

RF

PAF, Per-AF

12 mo

64 ± 7

40

8.3

LAAeV

Nakatani [20]

Japan

R

126

RF

PAF, Per-AF

12 mo

62 ± 11

22

15

LAAeV

E Gul [18]

Canada

R

59

RF

PeAF

13 mo (4–67)+

64.6 ± 9.8

56

N/R

LAAV

LAA_m

Zheng [19]

China

P

62

RF

PAF, Per-AF

N/R

N/R

N/R

N/R

LAAV

Shiozawa [17]

Japan

P

77

RF

PAF, Per-AF

580 ± 255 d

59 ± 8

19.48

N/R

LAAV

LAAeV

LAAOA

LAA_m

Pinto Teixeira [21]

Portugal

P

52

RF

PAF, Per-AF

305.9 ± 144.6 d

54 ± 10

42

N/R

LAAV

Nedios [22]

Germany

R

104

RF

PAF, Per-AF

26 ± 14 mo

58 ± 10

31

5.76

LAAV

He [23]

China

P

80

RF

PAF

12 mo

57.31 ± 10.42

40

20

LAAeV

LAAEF

Kocyigit [24]

Turkey

P

359

CB

PAF, Per-AF

37 mo (17–60)+

56.41 ± 7.88

49.42

N/R

LAAOA

LAA_m

Du [25]

China

R

108

RF

PAF, Per-AF

12 mo

63.1 ± 8.1

46.3

N/R

LAAV

LAAOA

Tian [26]

China

R

83

RF

PAF, Per-AF

19 mo (4–24)+

60.36 ± 10.11

40.9

21.6

LAAV

LAAEF

Yang 2020

China

P

215

RF

Per-AF

R( +): 4 mo (3–5)+

R(-): 6 mo (6–6)+

R( +) 62.9 ± 9.4

R(-) 62.8 ± 9.6

R( +)16.4 R(-) 26.3

N/R

LAAeV

Wei [29]

China

P

150

RF

PAF, Per-AF

14 mo+

64 ± 11

45.3

12.6

LAAeV

Straube [30]

Germany

R

473

CB

PAF, Per-AF

19 mo+

66.2 ± 9.5

40

N/R

LAAV

LAAOA

LAA_m

Gong [31]

China

R

84

RF

PAF, Per-AF

618.6 d

R( +) 67.5 ± 7.5 R(-) 66.1 ± 9.0

30.95

N/R

LAAeV

LAA_m

Yang [28, 32]

China

R

164

RF

Per-AF

15 mo (12–18)+

58.2 ± 9.7

23.17

9.8

LAAeV

You [33]

China

R

238

RF, CB, RF + CB

PAF

48 mo+

59.37 ± 11.0

45.4

5.9

LAAeV

Istratoaie [34]

Romania

P

81

RF

PAF

12 mo (11–14)+

55.3 ± 9

40.7

N/R

LAAeV

Ma [35]

China

R

124

RF

PAF, Per-AF

12 ± 3 mo

R( +) 65.5 ± 6

R(-) 62.6 ± 7.3

R( +)31.7

R(-) 41.4

N/R

LAAeV

Kielbasa 2021

Poland

R

417

CB

PAF

24 mo

(15.5–45.6)+

59 (mean)

39.3

3.1

LAAeV

Kim [37]

Korea

R

992

RF

PAF, Per-AF

36 mo

55.8 ± 10.5

20.4

4

LAAV

Kim [39]

Korea

R

3.120

RF

PAF, Per-AF

36 mo

55.74 ± 10.96

21.1

9.4

LAAeV

Spittler [40]

Germany

R

134

RF

Per-AF

19.6 ± 14.6 mo

63.8 ± 10.2

36.6

N/R

LAAeV

Simon [41]

Hungary

R

561

RF

PAF, Per-AF

recurrence-free time

22.7 mo+

61.9 ± 10.2

34.9

12.7

LAAV

LAAeV

LAAOA

Szegedi [42]

Hungary

R

428

RF

PAF

8.8–43 mo

60.7 ± 10.8

35.5

6.1

LAA_m

  1. + = median, R( +) = recurrence, R(-) = no recurrence, N/R not reported, PAF paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, Per-AF persistent atrial fibrillation, NPAF non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, AFCA atrial fibrillation catheter ablation, RF radiofrequency ablation, CB cryoablation, FU follow-up, N study population, R retrospective, P prospective, mo months, d days, HF heart failure, LAA left atrial appendage, LAAV LAA volume, LAAeV LAA emptying velocity, LAAOA LAA orifice area, LAAEF LAA ejection fraction, LAA_m LAA morphology, chicken wing versus non-chicken wing