Table 3 ECG characteristics and vitals comparison between patients affected by TCM and MI
ECG property (x) | Subtype | TCM (n1 total = 40) | MI (n2 total = 39) | p | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Â | n1 total % | No of Leads in TCM | n1% | n2 total % | n2% | |
ST elevation | Specific | 16 (40%) | 4 ± 2 | 13 (32.5%) | 8 (20.51%) | 3 (7.69%) | 0.043 |
| Â | Diffuse | 3 (7.5%) | 5 (12.82%) | 0.474 | |||
ST depression | Specific | 12 (30%) | 4 ± 2 | 6 (15%) | 6 (15.38%) | 4 (10.25%) | 0.555 |
| Â | Diffuse | 6 (15%) | 2 (5.12%) | 0.189 | |||
T Wave Inversion | Specific | 16 (40%) | 7 ± 3 | 1 (2.5%) | 11 (28.20%) | 10 (25.64%) | 0.004 |
| Â | Diffuse | 15 (37.5%) | Â | 1 (2.56%) | 0.001 | ||
Normal Q Wave |  | 10 (25%) | 3 ± 2 |  | 3 (7.69%) |  | 0.086 |
Poor R progression | Specific | 8 (20%) | Â | 5 (12.5%) | 6 (15.38%) | 6 (15.38%) | 0.666 |
| Â | Diffuse | Â | 3 (7.5%)Â | 0 (0%)Â | 0.211 | ||
Conduction Abnormalities | AV Block | 3 (7.5%) | Â | 3 (7.5%) | 4 (10.25%) | 1 (2.56%) | 0.422 |
| Â | BBB | Â | 0 (0%) | 3 (7.69%) | 0.308 | ||
Sinus Tachycardia | Â | 6(15%) | Â | Â | Â 1 (2.56%) | Â | 0.120 |
Vital parameters | TCM (n1 total = 40) | MI (n2 total = 39) |
|---|---|---|
Pulse rate (bpm) | 85 ± 22(63, 107) | 79 ± 8 (70, 87) |
SBP (mm/Hg) | 125 ± 32 (94, 157) | 132 ± 30(102, 162) |
DBP (mm/Hg) | 76 ± 14(63, 90) | 85 ± 13(72, 98) |