Skip to main content

Egyptian practical guidance in lipid management 2020

Abstract

Background

Numerous epidemiological investigations and randomized clinical studies have determined that dyslipidemia is a major contributor to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Consequently, the management of serum cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein levels has become a central objective in the effort to prevent cardiovascular events.

Main body

Many guidelines were issued by different organizations and societies to define patient risk and establish important recommendations for management strategies. Newer cholesterol-lowering agents (non-statin drugs) are described, and their use is directed primarily to secondary prevention in patients at very high risk of new ASCVD.

Conclusion

The present guidance summarizes the current methods for risk estimation and outlines the most recent data on lipid management in a simple user-friendly format, to improve physician awareness and help implement guidelines in the daily practice.

Background

Recently, World Health Organization (WHO) reported that cardiovascular diseases (CVD) account for 46% of total deaths in Egypt. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) are a key public health problem with considerable social and economic consequences in terms of healthcare demands, lost efficiency, and premature mortality [1]. Egypt is having a high incidence of early atherosclerotic cardiovascular events. The incidence of CVD is fast-shifting to the youth, a trend that is specifically prevalent in the capital city of Cairo and the underserved urban societies, where adoption of unhealthy lifestyles, fast food-eating habits, and sedentary lifestyles are an increasing reality [1,2,3]. Dyslipidemia is a major risk factor for CVD, and researches have demonstrated that 37% of the Egyptian population has elevated blood cholesterol levels with an overall target accomplishment of only 34.4% [4, 5]. Multiple risk factors are usually involved in the development of ASCVD; therefore, assessment of total cardiovascular (CV) risk becomes imperative.

Main text

The rationale of this consensus is to provide the most recent data on lipid management in a simple user-friendly format, improve physician awareness, and help implement guidelines. It emphasizes the practical aspects in lipid management, answers commonly asked valuable questions on dyslipidemia, and contributes to reducing CV onus in Egypt (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Approach to lipid management

Who and when should we screen?

Visiting a physician is always an opportunity for checkup

Screening for CV risk including complete lipid profile is recommended for all adults ≥ 40 years, at any age in individuals having ASCVD, e.g., coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease (PAD), or risk factors like diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, obesity, and smoking. Screening should be considered as early as age 2 years in persons with a family history of early CVD or familial hypercholesterolemia (FH); it can be considered in adults at the age of 20 years or more and not on lipid-lowering therapy [1,2,3,4,5,6].

How should we screen?

Lipid testing can generally be done non-fasting, while fasting lipid profile is recommended for individuals with triglycerides (TG) > 400 mg/dL, or having a history of familial dyslipidemia. In addition to lipid profile testing, the risk evaluation must include history taking and physical examination including blood pressure measurement. Lipid profile should include total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), TG, and non-HDL-C. Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) is advised for the risk evaluation especially in individuals with high TG, DM, obesity or metabolic syndrome, or very low LDL-C. Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] should be taken into account at least once in life, and in certain patients with positive family history of premature CVD [1,2,3].

How to assess CVD risk?

According to the latest guidelines, risk assessment is based on country-specific risk charts. The most available and commonly used one is the European SCORE (Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation) system. It is reconfigured for use by adapting for materialistic changes in CVD deaths and risk factor occurrence [1, 4,5,6]. In Egypt, it is recommended to use the high-risk SCORE chart, knowing that this may underestimate the risk in very-high-risk countries like ours, having a cardiovascular disease mortality rate > 350/100,000 [1].

Total CV risk estimation is advised for asymptomatic adults > 40 years without evidence of CVD, DM, chronic kidney disease (CKD), FH, and LDL-C > 190 mg/dL, as these categories are at high or very high risk and are not requiring risk scoring. Arterial (carotid and/or femoral) plaque load on the ultrasound and coronary calcium score assessment on computed tomography (CT) might be considered as risk changers in persons at low or moderate risk [7]. Therapeutic objectives are based on the risk point (the higher the risk, the lower the LDL-C goal), as shown in (Table 1) [1].

Table 1 Risk categories and LDL-C goals

When to initiate and how to treat?

Management is always based on the level of risk. Lifestyle advice is recommended for all individuals regardless of their cardiovascular risk. In patients who are at low or moderate risk with LDL-C levels above the respective goals (but < 190 mg/dL), a 3-month trial of lifestyle intervention is recommended followed by re-assessment of lipid profile [8,9,10].

What are the LDL-C goals?

In both primary and secondary preventive measures for individuals at extremely high risk, a therapeutic program that achieves ≥ 50% LDL-C reduction from baseline and an LDL-C goal of < 55 mg/dL are recommended. In patients at high risk, a treatment regimen that achieves ≥50% LDL-C reduction from baseline and an LDL-C goal of < 70 mg/dL is recommended. In individuals at moderate risk, an LDL-C goal of < 100 mg/dL should be taken into consideration. In persons who are at low risk, an LDL-C goal < 116 mg/dL may be considered [1].

What are the non-HDL goals?

Non-HDL-C secondary goals are < 85, 100, and 130 mg/dL for very high-, high-, and moderate-risk people, respectively [1].

What is the therapeutic regimen?

It is highly advised that a maximum tolerated dose of statin is uptitrated to achieve the goal level specific for each category of risk. If the maximum allowed dose of statin does not achieve the required levels, a combination with ezetimibe is highly recommended. In patients at very high risk not achieving their goal on a maximum tolerated dose of a statin and ezetimibe, adding a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor is encouraged. If a statin-based program will not be tolerated at any dosage (even after re-challenge), ezetimibe should be taken into consideration. PCSK9 inhibitor, added to ezetimibe, may also be considered to reach the LDL target level [1, 10, 11]. We endorse the recommendations of the Egyptian Association of Vascular Biology and Atherosclerosis (EAVA) on the usage of PCSK9 inhibitors in addition to statins ± ezetimibe in patients with ASCVD, by definition at very high risk; patients with ASCVD at very high risk who do not tolerate appropriate doses of at least three statins; and familial hypercholesterolemia patients with clinically diagnosed ASCVD, at very high CV risk [12].

Management of dyslipidemia in different clinical settings

Elderly

For primary prevention, statin therapy is recommended for older individuals, > 75 years, according to the risk level (as mentioned in Table 1). Introduction of statin therapy for primary prevention in this fragile group may be considered if at a high risk or above. It is recommended that the statin is started at a low dose especially if there is substantial renal impairment and/or there is potential for drug interactions, and then up titrated upwards to accomplish the LDL-C treatment goals [1,2,3].

Children and adolescents

In children and adolescents, it is advised to deepen lifestyle therapy in those who suffer from lipid disorders related to obesity, involving moderate caloric restriction and regular aerobic physical activity [13]. However, it is reasonable to start statin in children and adolescents ≥ 10 years of age if LDL-C level is persistently ≥ 190 mg/dL or ≥ 160 mg/dL with a clinical presentation consistent with FH, and if they do not respond adequately with 3 to 6 months of lifestyle therapy [6].

Women

Lipid-lowering therapy should not be given 1 to 2 months before pregnancy is attempted, during pregnancy or breast-feeding. However, for severe FH, refer to a lipid specialist. Women of reproductive age who are being treated with statin and are sexually involved should be encouraged to use a credible form of contraception. Lipid-lowering therapy is highly recommended for primary and secondary prevention in women with the same target levels as men [1] (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Treatment algorithm for LDL-C lowering. *Add PCSK9 inhibitor for secondary prevention in very-high-risk patients and for primary prevention in patients with FH and another major risk factor (very high risk). *Consider adding PCSK9 inhibitor for primary prevention patients at very high risk, but without FH

Acute coronary syndromes

Reda et al. [14] in phase II of the Egyptian cross-sectional CardioRisk project showed that premature ACS is prevalent in Egypt with 43% of men aged less than 55 years, and 67% of women under 65 years suffering from the disease, hence, the importance of treating the underlying risk factors.

It is recommended to initiate high-intensity statin therapy as soon as possible, irrespective of baseline LDL-C values, in all ACS patients not having contraindications or definite intolerance history. Lipid levels should be re-checked 4–6 weeks following ACS to establish whether the LDL-C target < 55 mg/dL has been achieved. If the LDL-C goal is not achieved after 4–6 weeks despite maximally tolerated statin therapy, adding ezetimibe is recommended. In patients in whom LDL-C goal is not achieved in spite of maximally tolerated statin therapy and ezetimibe, as well as in patients with statin contraindication or intolerance, adding PCSK9-inhibitor is recommended.

In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), regular treatment with high-dose statin (or loading on a background of chronic therapy) should be taken into consideration for primary or elective PCI. For patients with ASCVD who experience a second vascular event within 2 years (not necessarily of the same type as the first event) while taking maximally tolerated statin-based therapy, an LDL-C goal of < 40 mg/dL may be considered [15,16,17].

Stroke

In the general population, high TC is associated with higher risk of ischemic stroke. A meta-analysis of 26 trials that included > 90,000 patients found that statins reduced the risk of all strokes by approximately 21% [18]. Patients with a history of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) are at very high risk of recurrent ASCVD, and it is recommended that they receive intensive LDL-C-lowering therapy to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and vascular death [1].

Peripheral arterial disease

Patients with PAD are at very high risk of ASCVD. They are strongly advised to receive high-intensity LDL-C lowering therapy to reduce the risk of CV events, worsening of claudication, and to improve walking performance [1].

Diabetes mellitus

Diabetic dyslipidemia involves a triad of elevation in the level of TG, with decrease in HDL-C, and formation of small dense LDL particles [19]. Diabetic patients cannot be at low risk; they are at either very high, high, or at least moderate risk, as shown in (Table 2). The primary target in patients with DM remains LDL-C [1, 20]. However, due to the malignant nature of diabetic dyslipidemia that is not always revealed by elevation of LDL-C, secondary targets like non-HDL-C are particularly important in the diabetic population [21].

Table 2 Risk stratification for DM patients

In patients with T2DM at very high risk, an LDL-C reduction of ≥ 50% from baseline and an LDL-C goal of < 55 mg/dL are recommended. In patients with T2DM at high risk, an LDL-C reduction of ≥ 50% from baseline and an LDL- C goal of < 70 mg/dL are recommended. Statins are recommended in patients with T1DM who are at high or very high risk. Statins are the main stay of therapy in diabetic patients; however, if the target LDL-C is not reached, combination therapy with ezetimibe is recommended. It is reasonable to give a combination of statin and ezetimibe from the start in very-high-risk patients. In patients at very high risk, with persistent high LDL-C despite treatment with a maximally tolerated statin dose, in combination with ezetimibe, as well as in patients having statin intolerance, a PCSK9 inhibitor is recommended. Lifestyle intervention is recommended (with a focus on weight reduction, and decreased consumption of fast-absorbed carbohydrates and alcohol). Icosapent should be considered in patients with high TG levels (above 200 mg/dL). Fibrates may be added in patients with low HDL-C and high TG levels (above 200 mg/dL) who are at high risk [1,2,3,4].

Chronic kidney disease

In the adult population, decreasing GFR is associated with increased CVD risk, independent of other risk factors. In the early stages of CKD, TG and Lp (a) readings are high, while HDL-C levels are low. LDL is changed into small dense LDL particles. Patients with stages 3a and 3b CKD (eGFR 30–59 mL/min/1.73m2) are considered to be at high risk of ASCVD, while those with stages 4 and 5 CKD (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m2) are considered to be at great risk of ASCVD. The usage of statins or statin/ezetimibe combination is recommended in non-dialysis-dependent stages 3–5 CKD. In patients who are on statins, ezetimibe, or a statin/ezetimibe combination before dialysis commencement, the continuation of these drugs must be taken into account, particularly in patients with evidence of ASCVD. In dialysis-dependent CKD patients, who have ASCVD, the introduction of lipid-lowering medications should be considered. Expert opinion of a cardiologist and a nephrologist is advised for post-renal transplant and dialysis-dependent CKD patients [1,2,3,4,5,6] (Table 3).

Table 3 Statin doses in CKD patients

Familial dyslipidemias

Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) is a relatively common disorder. Its prevalence in the general population is estimated to be 1/200–250. Homozygous FH (HoFH) is a rare and life-threatening disease with a frequency of 1/160,000–1/320,000. FH causes premature CVD, with at least10-fold increased risk, due to lifetime very high plasma levels of LDL-C. The diagnosis of FH is usually based on clinical presentation. The Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) is the commonly used criteria [15, 16, 22]. The diagnosis can be confirmed by showing relevant mutations in the pathogenic genes. FH should be suspected if LDL-C is > 190 mg/dL, there is history of premature CAD in the patient or a family member, there are tendon xanthomas in the patient or a family member, or there is history of sudden premature cardiac death of a family member [1, 23, 24].

Other familial dyslipidemias include familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCH) which is a very common mixed dyslipidemia (prevalence is 1:100–200) characterized by elevated concentrations of LDL-C, TG, or both and is an important cause of premature CAD. Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia is a rare inherited disorder and occurs due to genetic disorder for the E2 isoform of Apo E [1].

It is strongly recommended that FH need to be detected using clinical criteria, and verified via DNA analysis. Once the diagnosis of the index patient is established, family screening becomes essential. Patients with FH and ASCVD or who have another major risk factor are treated as being at very high risk, to achieve ≥ 50% reduction from baseline and an LDL-C < 55 mg/dL, while patients with no prior ASCVD or other risk factors are treated as being at high-risk. If LDL-C target is not achieved, a drug combination is recommended. Similar approach and target are recommended in FH patients at very high-risk group if primary prevention is proposed. Treatment with a PCSK9 inhibitor is recommended in very high-risk FH patients if the treatment goal is not attained on maximally tolerated statin plus ezetimibe [1].

Management of hypertriglyceridemia

Hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) prevalence in adults is 10%.(25) HTG may be primary due to genetic causes or secondary to many causes such as increased alcohol consumption, obesity, metabolic syndrome, DM, hypothyroidism, renal disease, pregnancy, systemic lupus erythematosis (SLE), and medications (including corticosteroids, oral estrogen, tamoxifen, thiazides, non-cardio-selective beta-blockers, and bile acid sequestrants).(26) Fasting samples remain the method of choice. For non-fasting samples, TG > 175 mg/dL should be flagged as abnormal, while for fasting samples, abnormal concentrations correspond to TG > 150 mg/dL. Severe HTG, defined as plasma TG > 500 mg/dL is less common. Very severe HTG is defined as TG > 1000 mg/dL. The effect of LDL-C-lowering drugs such as statins, ezetimibe, and PCSK9 inhibitors on TG levels is usually modest (5–15%). Fibrates, omega-3-fatty acids, and niacin have more profound effects (25–45%). Although LDL-C-lowering drugs have only moderate effects on TG levels, they reduce ASCVD risk in patients with and without HTG. The most important principle for treating individuals with HTG is to manage lifestyle factors associated with HTG including increased alcohol consumption, DM, and obesity [1, 25, 26].

Recommendations

It is recommended to exclude and treat secondary causes of HTG [TG levels > 200 mg/dL]. Patients with HTG and at high risk must receive statin as a first-line treatment to reduce CVD risk. In high-risk (or above) patients with TG levels between 135 and 499 mg/dL despite statin treatment, n-3 PUFAs (icosapent ethyl 2 × 2 g/day) should be considered in combination with a statin. In high-risk patients who are at LDL-C goal with TG levels > 200 mg/dL, fenofibrate or bezafibrate might be considered in combination with statins. In selected primary prevention patients who are at low to moderate CV risk with TG levels > 200 mg/dL, omega-3 fatty acids may be considered [1].

Lifestyle goals for cardiovascular disease prevention

Carbohydrate intake should comprise 45 to 55% of the total energy intake. Intake of fruits, vegetables, legumes, nuts, whole grain cereal foods, dietary fibers, and fish is encouraged. Foods rich in trans-fats, alcohol consumption and exposure to smoking in any form should be avoided. Foods rich in saturated fats should not exceed 10%. Mono-unsaturated fat and poly-unsaturated fat should be used instead of saturated fats. The salt intake should be reduced to < 5 g/day. Moderately vigorous physical activity 30 to 60 min in most days is advised. Reduction of body weight should be advised (preferred body mass index (BMI) of 20 to 25 kg/m2, and waist circumference of < 94 cm in men and < 80 cm in women [1].

Follow-up and surveillance
How often should lipids be tested?
- Before starting lipid treatment.
- 4–12 weeks after starting therapy, or after dose modification, until the goal is achieved, then annually, unless otherwise specified.
How often should liver enzymes (ALT) be tested?
- Routinely, before treatment.
- Once (8–12 weeks) after starting therapy or after dose increase.
- Routine control of ALT then is not recommended during statin treatment unless previous ALT results were high or symptoms of liver disease develop. Similarly, with fibrates, control of ALT is still recommended.
How often should muscle enzymes (CK) be tested?
- Routinely, before treatment.
- If CK is > 4 x ULN, do not begin the drug therapy and re-check.
- Routine surveillance of CK is not recommended except if patient develops statin-associated muscle symptoms. (SAMS) (or CK increased).
Statin-associated muscle symptoms (SAMS):
Muscle pain, weakness, or aches, which occasionally occur with statin treatment, which may be associated with rise of creatine kinase (CK). Rhabdomyolysis (CK > 10 × ULN + renal injury): is the most severe form characterized by severe muscular pain, muscle necrosis, and myoglobinuria potentially leading to renal failure and death.
In which patients should HbA1c or blood glucose be checked?
Routine checks of HbA1c or glucose should be taken into consideration in patients at high risk to develop diabetes, and on high-dose statin, elderly, and patients with metabolic syndrome, obesity, or other signs of insulin resistance.

Lipid-lowering drugs

Statins

Statins lower cholesterol levels through selective and competitive inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase. They also reduce VLDL and IDL, which are LDL precursors and so they also decrease TG. High-intensity statin therapy typically lowers LDL-C levels by ≥ 50%, moderate-intensity statin therapy by 30% to 49%, and low-intensity statin therapy by < 30%. Myositis, myopathy, and elevation of the liver enzymes are the main side effects. Atorvastatin (10–80 mg), rosuvastatin (5–40 mg), simvastatin (10–40 mg), pravastatin (10–80 mg), fluvastatin (20–80 mg), and lovastatin (20–80 mg) are the main statins used [27, 28].

Ezetimibe

Ezetimibe inhibits cholesterol absorption at the small intestine brush lining, resulting in a decrease in intestinal cholesterol passage to the liver. The recommended dose for adults is 10 mg once daily [29].

PCSK9 inhibitors

PCSK9 inhibitors are fully human IgG monoclonal antibodies that selectively bind PCSK9 and prevent its binding with the LDL receptors, resulting in a reduction of LDL-C, TC, ApoB, and non-HDL-C. They decrease LDL-C levels by approximately 60%. Alirocumab and evolocumab are the currently commercially available PCSK9 inhibitors [30].

Bile acid sequestrants

Bile acid-binding resins bind to the main biliary acids, causing increased plasma LDL and IDL uptake. Gastrointestinal side effects are the most common. Bile acid sequestrants may delay or reduce the absorption of many drugs. So it is better taken at least 1 h before and 4–6 h after taking resins [31].

Omega-3 fatty acids

Omega-3 fatty acids are poly-unsaturated fatty acids that have functional and metabolic effects (reduce serum TG (through an increase in the oxidation of fatty acids)). The pharmaceutical form is represented by soft capsules of 1000 mg, containing 460–465 mg of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and 375–380 mg of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), taken twice a day. The common side effects are gastrointestinal.

Fibrates

Fibrates (fenofibrate, bezafibrate, ciprofibrate, and gemfibrozil) exert their effects mainly by activating the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR-alpha) leading to a decrease in TG levels and an increase in HDL-C levels. The effect on LDL-C levels is variable. The active metabolite of fenofibrate is excreted mainly through kidneys. Combination of gemfibrozil and statins is not recommended [1, 32].

Niacin

Niacin raises HDL levels significantly but decreases VLDL and LDL levels. It acts mainly by preventing lipolysis in adipose tissue. The most common side effect of niacin is skin vasodilatation (flushing and itching), reversible increase in plasma levels of AST and ALT. Its combination with statins may lead to an increased risk of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis [1, 27].

Lomitapide and mipomersen

Lomitapide is a selective inhibitor of the microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) and reduces LDL-C levels by approximately 40%. Mipomersen is an antisense oligonucleotide that inhibits the production of apoB-100 and lowers LDL-C by approximately 37%. Both represent new therapeutic approaches for patients with homozygous FH who do not reach LDL targets with statins [33].

Conclusion

Management algorithms proposed in this document are simple, cover the clinical situations most commonly observed in routine practice, and are designed to improve the quality of care. The strategies recommended for elevated plasma lipids are a central objective in the effort to prevent ASCVD. Encouraging healthy lifestyle is essential in each approach. Screening for cardiovascular risk is recommended for all asymptomatic adults 40 years of age or older. High-risk SCORE chart is used for risk assessment in the Egyptian population. The target is to reduce LDL-C by 50% from the baseline and reach an absolute LDL-C of < 55 mg/dL for very-high-risk patients. A high-intensity statin is prescribed up to the highest tolerated dose to reach the treatment goals; if the goals are not achieved, ezetimibe, with or without a PCSK9 inhibitor, may be considered for secondary prevention.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the results and conclusions of this article will be available from the corresponding author on request.

Abbreviations

ALT:

Alanine transaminase

Apo B:

Apolipoprotein B

ASCVD:

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

AST:

Aspartate transaminase

BMI:

Body mass index

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

CK:

Creatine kinase

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

CT:

Computed tomography

CV:

Cardiovascular

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

DHA:

Docosahexaenoic acid

DLCN:

Dutch Lipid Clinic Network

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

eGFR:

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

EPA:

Eicosapentaenoic acid

FCH:

Familial combined hyperlipidemia

FH:

Familial hypercholesterolemia

GFR:

Glomerular filtration rate

HDL-C:

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

HeFH:

Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

HMG-CoA:

3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A

HoFH:

Homozygous FH

HTG:

Hypertriglyceridemia

IDL:

Intermediate-density lipoprotein

Ig G:

Immunoglobulin G

LDL-C:

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

LDLR:

Low-density lipoprotein receptor

Lp(a):

Lipoprotein (a)

MI:

Myocardial infarction

MTP:

Microsomal triglyceride transfer protein

PAD:

Peripheral arterial disease

PCSK9:

Proprotein convertase esubtilisin/kexin type 9

PCI:

Percutaneous coronary intervention

PPAR alpha:

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha

SAMS:

Statin-associated muscle symptoms

SCORE:

Systematic Coronary Risk Estimation

SLE:

Systemic lupus erythematosis

TC:

Total cholesterol

TG:

Triglycerides

TIA:

Transient ischemic attack

T1DM:

Type 1 diabetes mellitus

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

ULN:

Upper limit of normal

VLDL:

Very-low-density lipoprotein

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. 1.

    Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Koskinas KC, Casula M, Badimon L et al (2020) 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: Lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. European Heart Journal 41(1):111–188

  2. 2.

    Baigent C, Blackwell L, Emberson J, Holland LE, Reith C, Bhala N et al (2010) Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 376(9753):1670–1681

  3. 3.

    Michos ED, McEvoy JW, Blumenthal RS (2019) Lipid management for the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The New England Journal of Medicine 381(16):1557–1567

  4. 4.

    Reda A, Abdel-Rehim AA, Etman A, Afifi OSA (2014) Centralized pan-Middle East Survey on the under-treatment of hypercholesterolemia: results from the CEPHEUS study in Egypt. Cardiol Ther. 3(1–2):27–40

  5. 5.

    Farag ES, Reda A, Farag N, Salama S, Elbahry A, Sanad O et al (2017) The Egyptian cardiovascular risk factors project, phase (II) results: a multicenter observational study of the pattern of risk factor profile in Egyptian patients with acute coronary syndrome. Atherosclerosis. 263:e159

  6. 6.

    Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS et al (2019) 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 73(24):3168–3209

  7. 7.

    Mortensen MB, Falk E, Li D, Nasir K, Blaha MJ, Sandfort V et al (2018) Statin Trials, Cardiovascular events, and coronary artery calcification: implications for a trial-based approach to statin therapy in MESA. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 11(2P1):221–230

  8. 8.

    Anderson TJ, Grégoire J, Pearson GJ, Barry AR, Couture P, Dawes M et al (2016) 2016 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemia for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in the Adult. The Canadian Journal of Cardiology 32(11):1263–1282

  9. 9.

    Cooney MT, Dudina AL, Graham IM (2009) Value and limitations of existing scores for the assessment of cardiovascular risk. a review for clinicians. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 54(14):1209–1227

  10. 10.

    Hajifathalian K, Ueda P, Lu Y, Woodward M, Ahmadvand A, Aguilar-Salinas CA et al (2015) A novel risk score to predict cardiovascular disease risk in national populations (Globorisk): a pooled analysis of prospective cohorts and health examination surveys. Lancet Diab Endocrinol 3(5):339–355

  11. 11.

    Cooney MT, Dudina A, D’Agostino R, Graham IM (2010) Cardiovascular risk-estimation systems in primary prevention: do they differ? do they make a difference? can we see the future? Circulation. 122(3):300–310

  12. 12.

    Reda A, Elserafy AS, Farag E, Mostafa T, Farag N, Elbahry A et al (2020) Egyptian Association of Vascular Biology and Atherosclerosis (EAVA) consensus on the usage of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors. Egypt Hear J. 72(1):23–23

  13. 13.

    Jacobson TA, Maki KC, Orringer CE, Jones PH, Kris-Etherton P, Sikand G et al (2015) National lipid association recommendations for patient-centered management of dyslipidemia: Part 2. Journal of Clinical Lipidology 9(6):S1–S122.e1

  14. 14.

    Reda A, Soliman M, El Kersh A, Abdou W, Mostafa M, Beshay M et al (2019) The pattern of risk-factor profile in Egyptian patients with acute coronary syndrome: phase II of the Egyptian cross-sectional CardioRisk project. Cardiovascular Journal of Africa 30(2):87–94

  15. 15.

    Austin MA, Hutter CM, Zimmern RL, Humphries SE (2004) Genetic causes of monogenic heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: a HuGE prevalence review. American Journal of Epidemiology 160(5):407–420

  16. 16.

    Haase A, Goldberg AC (2012) Identification of people with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Current Opinion in Lipidology 23(4):282–289

  17. 17.

    Nordestgaard BG, Chapman MJ, Humphries SE, Ginsberg HN, Masana L, Descamps OS et al (2013) Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: Guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease. European Heart Journal 34:45

  18. 18.

    Amarenco P, Labreuche J, Lavallée P, Touboul PJ (2004) Statins in stroke prevention and carotid atherosclerosis: systematic review and up-to-date meta-analysis. Stroke. 35(12):2902–2909

  19. 19.

    Hirano T (2018) Pathophysiology of diabetic dyslipidemia. Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis 25(9):771–782

  20. 20.

    (2018) Cardiovascular disease and risk management: standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care 41(Suppl 1):S86–S104

  21. 21.

    Mark L, Vallejo-Vaz AJ, Reiber I, Paragh G, Kondapally Seshasai SR, Ray KK (2015) Non-HDL cholesterol goal attainment and its relationship with triglyceride concentrations among diabetic subjects with cardiovascular disease: a nationwide survey of 2674 individuals inHungary. Atherosclerosis. 241(1):62–68

  22. 22.

    Nordestgaard M, Humphries J, Ginsberg SE, Masana HN, Descamps L, Wiklund OS, Hegele O, Raal RA, BGC FJ, Defesche JC, Wiegman A, Santos RD, Watts GF, Parhofer KG et al (2013) Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease: Consensus Statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society. European Heart Journal 34:3478–3490a

  23. 23.

    Sjouke B, Kusters DM, Kindt I, Besseling J, Defesche JC, Sijbrands EJG et al (2015) Homozygous autosomal dominant hypercholesterolaemia in the Netherlands: prevalence, genotype-phenotype relationship, and clinical outcome. European Heart Journal 36(9):560–565

  24. 24.

    Akioyamen LE, Genest J, Shan SD, Reel RL, Albaum JM, Chu A et al (2017) Estimating the prevalence of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 7(9):e016461

  25. 25.

    Laufs U, Parhofer KG, Ginsberg HN, Hegele RA (2020) Clinical review on triglycerides. European Heart Journal 41(1):99–109c

  26. 26.

    Hypertriglyceridemia Management According to the 2018 AHA/ACC Guideline - American College of Cardiology. https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/articles/2019/01/11/07/39/hypertriglyceridemia-management-according-to-the-2018-aha-acc-guideline

  27. 27.

    Zodda D, Giammona R, Schifilliti S (2018) Treatment strategy for dyslipidemia in cardiovascular disease prevention: focus on old and new drugs. Pharmacy. 6(1):10

  28. 28.

    Raghow R (2017) Statins redux: a re-assessment of how statins lower plasma cholesterol. World Journal of Diabetes 8(6):230

  29. 29.

    Bays H (2002) Ezetimibe. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 11(11): 6161587–1604

  30. 30.

    Shapiro MD, Tavori H, Fazio S (2018) PCSK9 from basic science discoveries 618 to clinical trials. Circulation Research 122(10):1420–1438

  31. 31.

    He L, Wickremasingha P, Lee J, Tao B, Mendell-Harary J, Walker J et al (2014) Lack of effect of colesevelam HCl on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of aspirin, atenolol, enalapril, phenytoin, rosiglitazone, and sitagliptin. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 104(3):401–409

  32. 32.

    Chapman MJ, Redfern JS, McGovern ME, Giral P (2010) Niacin and fibrates in atherogenic dyslipidemia: pharmacotherapy to reduce cardiovascular risk. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 126(3):314–345

  33. 33.

    Blom DJ, Raal FJ, Santos RD, Marais AD (2019) Lomitapide and mipomersen—inhibiting microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) and apoB100 synthesis. Current Atherosclerosis Reports 21(12):48

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Prof Mohamed Abdelghany MD, Prof Ahmed Abdellatif Ramadan MD, Dr Magdy El Khadem MD, Prof Tarek Abouelazm MD, and Dr Ihab Habbal MD, for reviewing the manuscript.

Funding

None

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have read and approved the manuscript. HS: main author, put the idea behind this review and wrote and approved the final manuscript. HM: contributed to the writing of this manuscript and has read and approved the final manuscript. HK: contributed to the writing of this manuscript and has read and approved the final manuscript. NF: contributed to the writing of this manuscript and has read and approved the final manuscript. AO: contributed to the writing of this manuscript and has read and approved the final manuscript. MS: contributed to the writing of this manuscript and has read and approved the final manuscript. KS: contributed to the writing of this manuscript and has read and approved the final manuscript. FF: contributed to the writing of this manuscript and has read and approved the final manuscript. HM: contributed to the writing of this manuscript and has read and approved the final manuscript. JB: contributed to the writing of this manuscript and has read and approved the final manuscript. MS: contributed to the writing of this manuscript and has read and approved the final manuscript. MM: contributed to the writing of this manuscript and has read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hesham Salah El Din Taha.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

Dr. Hala Mahfouz Badran is a co-author of this study. She has not handled this manuscript to avoid any conflict of interest. The rest of the authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taha, H.S.E.D., Badran, H.M., Kandil, H. et al. Egyptian practical guidance in lipid management 2020. Egypt Heart J 73, 17 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43044-021-00140-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Dyslipidemia
  • Practical guidance
  • Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease