Skip to main content

Evaluation of the relationship between diabetic retinopathy and left atrial deformation parameters

Abstract

Background

Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) may develop without coronary artery disease, hypertension (HT), or valvular pathologies in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), which is defined as diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) and its pathophysiology is still unclear. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a microvascular complication of DM, and patients with DR have increased risk for the development of heart failure (HF). Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) evaluates longitudinal deformation in left atrium (LA) myocardium and previous studies utilizing 2D-STE have revealed the detrimental effects of DM on LA functions. Although some studies have shown the association between DR and left ventricle (LV) systolic functions, as far as the researchers of this study investigated, there is no study evaluating the relationship between LA deformation parameters and DR. Hence, we aimed to investigate the relationship between the presence and the degree of DR and LA deformation parameters.

Results

LA deformation parameters were analyzed in terms of LA reservoir, conduit, and contractile functions according to the degree of DR. LA reservoir strain value was 14.2 ± 3.6 in normal retina group, 12.2 ± 4.1 in non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) group, and 13 ± 3.7 in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) group (P = 0.04). LA contractile strain was 15.9 ± 6.8 in normal retina group, 13.1 ± 47.4 in NPDR group, and 9.9 ± 4.7 in PDR group (P < 0.001). LA conduit strain was 30.1 ± 6.6 in normal retina group, 25.3 ± 6.5 in NPDR group, and 22.9 ± 4.9 in PDR group (P < 0.001). Proportional odds regression for association between clinical data, echocardiographic parameters, and LA contractile strain function showed that increasing creatinine (from 0.7 to 1.0; OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.51–0.99; P = 0.04), DR presence (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.11–0.50; P = 0.001), and increasing left atrial volume index (LAVI) (from 33.5 to 52.6; OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.43–0.89; P = 0.01) were associated with decreasing LA function; however, other variables indicated no association.

Conclusions

Our results showed the relationship between LA deformation parameters and DR, although microvascular involvement is not a certainly defined cardiovascular risk factor. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the clinical importance of DR presence and its degree for deformation parameters.

Background

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and the related cardiovascular complications are the important causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In patients with DM, left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) may develop without coronary artery disease, hypertension (HT), or valvular pathologies, and which is defined as diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM). Although the pathophysiology of DCM is still unclear, oxidative stress, renin-angiotensin system activation, impaired mitochondrial function, microangiopathy, hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, and hyperlipidemia have been suggested as most possible contributors [1, 2].

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a specific and common microvascular complication of DM. Studies have shown that the presence of DR has a high risk for heart failure (HF), independent of well-known cardiovascular risk factors [3].

In DCM, diastolic dysfunction (subclinical in general) is the most common cardiac manifestation thought to occur secondary to microvascular disease, and its association with DR supports this etiology [4]. In patients with or without microvascular complications, the presence of subclinical LVSD -even before diastolic dysfunction- could not be detected with routine transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) assessment. Hence, for early diagnosis, the two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) gains importance in patients with DM and preserved left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) [5].

The left atrium (LA) has multiple functions like contraction, conduit, and reservoir. LA interacts with the LV, the latter chamber fills. The prognostic role of the LA function in several conditions such as atrial fibrillation, HF, stroke, and valvular heart diseases has been described in previous studies [6].

2D-STE evaluates longitudinal deformation in the LA myocardium and previous research utilizing 2D-STE have revealed the detrimental effects of DM on the LA functions [7, 8]. Although studies have shown the association between DR and LV systolic functions [9], as far as the researchers of this study investigated, there is no study evaluating the relationship between LA deformation parameters and DR. Hence, in this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between the presence and the degree of DR and LA deformation parameters using 2D-STE technique.

Methods

In this single-center retrospective observational study, patients with DM, and who had been evaluated for retinopathy and referred to our outpatient cardiology clinic for cardiovascular system examination between September 2020 and April 2021 were included. The medical history, electrocardiogram and other noninvasive/invasive test results, physical examination, laboratory findings, echocardiography reports, as well as the results of LA strain analysis and 2D and Doppler echocardiography images were obtained from the hospital electronic database.

Patients with known coronary artery disease, those with ischemia diagnosed by noninvasive methods, and subjects with moderate to severe mitral valve regurgitation and without LA strain analysis were excluded from the study. Finally, a total of 147 patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled.

GE Vivid 7 ultrasound system was utilized for echocardiographic evaluation of the patients. Chamber diameters, wall thicknesses, LA volumes, and LVEF were assessed according to the recommendations of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACI). Moreover, LA strain analysis was performed using 2D-STE with Echo-Pac software package designed for LV strain evaluation, according to the previous guidelines [8, 10] and LA strain was also evaluated with this software.

The local ethical committee approved the study and all patients signed a written informed consent.

Statistical analysis

Numerical data were presented as mean and standard deviation (SD). Categorical data were defined as frequency and percentage. We used Student’s t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare continuous data, and Pearson’s Chi-Square test was used for comparison of categoric data. To determine independent predictors for dependent variable (LA strain parameters function), crude and adjusted proportional odds regression analyses were used.

Outcome variable

Left atrial strain parameters (contractile strain).

Statistical modeling

Multivariable proportional odds regression models were used. Predictors (confounders) of multivariable were selected according to previous literature. P-value less than 0.05 was defined as a statistical significance. Statistical analyses were performed using R 4.04 software (Vienna, Austria).

Results

In this study, a total of 147 diabetic patients were enrolled. The baseline characteristics of the patients according to the presence or absence of retinopathy are presented in Table 1. All patients were diagnosed with DM. The mean value of HbA1c (%) in the normal retina group was 7.3 ± 0.9, while it was 8.9 ± 1.9 in the retinopathy group. The mean age in patients without retinopathy was 52.6 ± 9.3, while it was 55.4 ± 10.3 in the retinopathy group. HT was present in 33 (66.7%) and 68 (58.6%) patients in normal retina and retinopathy groups, respectively. Other clinical and laboratory parameters are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Comparison of baseline clinical and laboratory parameters in diabetics with normal retina versus retinopathy

LVEF, end-diastolic volume, left atrial volume index (LAVI), and LV-twist values were similar between normal retina and retinopathy groups; however, mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) decreased in retinopathy group (13 ± 2 and 12 ± 2, respectively; P = 0.004). Also, global longitudinal strain (GLS) was lower in retinopathy group compared to normal retina group (− 18.9 ± 2.1 and − 17.8 ± 2.7, respectively; P = 0.008). Other echocardiographic parameters are presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Comparison of basic echocardiographic parameters in diabetics with normal retina vs. retinopathy

LA deformation parameters were analyzed in terms of LA reservoir, conduit, and contractile functions according to the degree of DR. The LA reservoir strain value was 14.2 ± 3.6 in normal retina group, 12.2 ± 4.1 in NPDR group, and 13 ± 3.7 in PDR group (P = 0.04). LA contractile strain was 15.9 ± 6.8 in normal retina group, 13.1 ± 47.4 in NPDR group, and 9.9 ± 4.7 in PDR group (P < 0.001). LA conduit strain was 30.1 ± 6.6 in normal retina group, 25.3 ± 6.5 in NPDR group, and 22.9 ± 4.9 in PDR group (P < 0.001). Three-dimensional plot for predicting LA conduit function according to DR presence and age is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Three-dimensional plot for predicting LA conduit function according to DR presence and age

Density histogram of LA contractile strain values of the three groups is shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Density histogram of LA contractile strain values of the three groups

The results of proportional odds regression analysis for association between clinical data, echocardiographic parameters, and LA contractile strain function demonstrated that increasing creatinine (from 0.7 to 1.0; OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.51–0.99; P = 0.04), retinopathy presence (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.11–0.50; P = 0.001), and increasing LAVI (from 33.5 to 52.6; OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.43–0.89; P = 0.01) were associated with decreasing LA function; however, other variables did not show any association (Table 3).

Table 3 Comparison of advanced echocardiographic parameters in diabetics with normal retina versus non-proliferative and proliferative retinopathy

Discussion

In this study, we determined an association between DR and LA contractile functions (OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.11–0.50; P = 0.001). Additionally, an increase in the degree of DR was correlated with a decrease in LA contractile, conduit, and reservoir functions (Table 4).

Table 4 Proportional odds regression model for predicting LA contractile strain function

The key role of LA remodeling in patients with DCM has been shown. Structural, mechanical, and functional changes develop in LA. Studies also revealed that LA function is a predictor for cardiovascular diseases in DM, even in patients without any cardiovascular risk factors [11, 12].

2D-STE is more sensitive than Doppler-derived strain measures because it allows angle independent direct analysis of myocardial deformation. The sensitivity of 2D-STE for LA mechanics has been recently validated. Abnormalities in LA strain have been shown in some clinical conditions, including LV hypertrophy, congenital heart diseases, dilated cardiomyopathy, and prolonged strenuous exercise [13,14,15].

The etiology for LA remodeling in DM is not well-known. Chronic hyperglycemia induces fibrosis in both ventricular and the atrial myocardium.

Hyperglycemia is also related with enhanced angiotensin II, TGF-β signaling, and increased reactive-oxygen species (ROC) production that probably promote atrial fibrosis in DCM, and it is associated with increased collagen synthesis.

Hyperglycemia can also be responsible for increased levels of advanced glycation end-products, which also provokes an increase in laminin and collagen, and thereby fibrosis. The decrease in LA elasticity related with fibrosis is a principal factor for all LA functions [16, 17].

The presence of DR suggests clinically manifested microvascular involvement in DM, and it is associated with impaired LV diastolic and/or systolic functions and might be a predictor of major adverse cardiac events. 2D-STE can detect subclinical functional changes in LA before the occurrence of structural changes [18, 19].

Georgievska-Ismail et al. evaluated the role of 2D-STE in LA systolic dysfunction in DM, suggesting that LA deformation mechanics are impaired in patients with DM and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) [20]. Also, Y. Mochizuki et al. demonstrated both LA systolic and diastolic dysfunctions in type 2 DM with diabetic nephropathy and albuminuria [21].

In addition to these studies, in our study, the presence of DR (as a microvascular involvement) was found to be associated with a decrease in LA contractile functions (normal retina group: 15.9 (6.8); NPDR group: 13.1 (7.4); and PDR group: 9.9 (4.7); P < 0.001).

In patients with DM, preventing the occurrence of DCM is an important strategy, which might be achieved by preventing DR because the association with microvascular involvement for both clinical conditions is well-defined. After the development of DR, modification of cardiovascular risk factors and close cardiac evaluation might be helpful.

Study limitations

Due to nature of regression model we might not include some important confounder, also this study is a single center study. We used retrospective design, even if consecutively admitted patients were included.

Conclusions

Our results showed the relationship between left atrial deformation parameters and diabetic retinopathy, although microvascular involvement is not a certainly defined cardiovascular risk factor. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the clinical importance of DR presence and its degree for deformation parameters.

Availability of data and materials

None.

Abbreviations

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

LVSD:

Left ventricular systolic dysfunction

HT:

Hypertension

DCM:

Diabetic cardiomyopathy

DR:

Diabetic retinopathy

HF:

Heart Failure

TTE:

Transthoracic echocardiography

2D-STE:

Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography

LVEF:

Ejection fraction

LA:

Left atrium

LV:

Left ventricle

TAPSE:

Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion

MAPSE:

Mitral annular plane systolic excursion

LAVI:

Left atrial volume index

GLS:

Global longitudinal strain

BP:

Blood pressure

LDL:

Low-density lipoprotein

TSH:

Thyroid stimulating hormone

WBC:

White blood cell

hs-CRP:

High sensitive C-reactive protein

References

  1. Tan Y, Zhang Z, Zheng C, Wintergerst KA, Keller BB, Cai L (2020) Mechanisms of diabetic cardiomyopathy and potential therapeutic strategies: preclinical and clinical evidence. Nat Rev Cardiol 17:585–607

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Brownlee M (2005) The pathobiology of diabetic complications: a unifying mechanism. Diabetes 54:1615–1625

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. From AM, Scott CG, Chen HH (2010) The development of heart failure in patients with diabetes mellitus and pre-clinical diastolic dysfunction a population-based study. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:300–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hiramatsu K, Ohara N, Shigematsu S, Aizawa T, Ishihara F, Niwa A et al (1992) Left ventricular filling abnormalities in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and improvement by a short-term glycemic control. Am J Cardiol 70:1185–1189

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Minciună IA, Hilda Orășan O, Minciună I et al (2021) Assessment of subclinical diabetic cardiomyopathy by speckle-tracking imaging. Eur J Clin Invest 51(4):e13475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kebed KY, Addetia K, Lang RM (2019) Importance of the left atrium: more than a bystander? Heart Fail Clin 15:191–204

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Tadic M, Ilic S, Cuspidi C, Ivanovic B, Bukarica L, Kostic N, Marjanovic T, Kocijancic V (2015) Celic V Left and right atrial phasic function and deformation in untreated patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 31:65–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Badano LP, Kolias TJ, Muraru D et al (2018) Standardization of left atrial, right ventricular, and right atrial deformation imaging using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: a consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 19:591–600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Karagöz A, Bezgin T, Kutlutürk I et al (2015) Subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction in diabetic patients and its association with retinopathy: a 2D speckle tracking echocardiography study. Herz 40(Suppl 3):240–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16:233–271

    Google Scholar 

  11. Obokata M, Negishi K, Kurosawa K et al (2013) Incremental diagnostic value of la strain with leg lifts in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6:749–758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mondillo S, Cameli M, Caputo ML et al (2011) Early detection of left atrial strain abnormalities by speckle-tracking in hypertensive and diabetic patients with normal left atrial size. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24(8):898–908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Winter R, Jussila R, Nowak J, Brodin LA (2007) Speckle tracking echocardiography is a sensitive tool for the detection of myocardial ischemia: a pilot study from the catheterization laboratory during percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 20:974–981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. D’Andrea A, Caso P, Romano S et al (2009) Association between left atrial myocardial function and exercise capacity in patients with either idiopathic or ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: a two-dimensional speckle strain study. Int J Cardiol 132:354–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oxborough D, Whyte G, Wilson M et al (2010) A depression in left ventricular diastolic filling following prolonged strenuous exercise is associated with changes in left atrial mechanics. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:968–976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ritchie RH (2020) Abel ED basic mechanisms of diabetic heart disease. Circ Res 126(11):1501–1525

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Masuda T, Muto S, Fujisawa G et al (2012) Heart angiotensin II-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy suppresses coronary angiogenesis and progresses diabetic cardiomyopathy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 302(9):H1871–H1883

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhen Z, Chen Y, Shih K, Liu JH, Yuen M, Wong DS, Lam KS, Tse HF, Yiu KH (2015) Altered myocardial response in patients with diabetic retinopathy: an exercise echocardiography study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 14:123

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Tanaka A, Ishii H, Tatami Y, Shibata Y, Osugi N, Ota T, Okumura S, Suzuki S, Inoue Y, Murohara T (2014) Impact of diabetic retinopathy on late cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Cardiol 64:175–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Georgievska-Ismail L, Zafirovska P, Hristovski Z (2016) Evaluation of the role of left atrial strain using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in patients with diabetes mellitus and heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Diabetes Vasc Dis Res 13:384–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mochizuki Y, Tanaka H, Matsumoto K et al (2016) Impaired mechanics of left ventriculo-atrial coupling in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Circ J 80:1957–1964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ŞK, RBA, and AU were responsible for data collection, drafting, and editing of the manuscript. YB, HCT, IKK, BK and EY were responsible for literature review and editing. AK, and CK were responsible for supervision of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Şeyhmus Külahçıoğlu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics committee approval was obtained from Kartal Koşuyolu High Specialization Training and Research Hospital Clinical Research Local Ethics Committee (12.12.2019) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent to participate was obtained from all patients.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent to publication was obtained from the patient.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Külahçıoğlu, Ş., Karagöz, I.K., Bilen, Y. et al. Evaluation of the relationship between diabetic retinopathy and left atrial deformation parameters. Egypt Heart J 74, 30 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43044-022-00265-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43044-022-00265-x

Keywords

  • Speckle tracking echocardiography
  • Left atrial contractile strain
  • Diabetic retinopathy