Skip to main content
The Egyptian Heart Journal
Download PDF

Prevalence of familial hypercholesterolemia in patients with confirmed premature coronary artery disease in Ranchi, Jharkhand

The Egyptian Heart Journal volume 74, Article number: 83 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an under-diagnosed autosomal co-dominant genetic disorder characterized by very high plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), premature coronary artery disease (CAD) with arcus cornealis, and xanthomas. Among patients with CAD, the frequency of FH is significantly higher than that of the general population, but little data are available in India in this regard. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of FH in patients with premature coronary artery disease for the first time in the Jharkhand population.

Results

The study was conducted on 200 premature CAD patients at RIMS hospital, Ranchi, from January 2020 to June 2021 with CAG-confirmed acute coronary syndrome. The study, without taking the aid of genetic profiling of the patients and using the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Criteria, revealed quite a high (23.5%) prevalence of potential FH in patients with premature CAD apart from the conventional risk factors. Mean LDL-C levels among patients with definite, probable, possible, and no FH were recorded as 250.39, 184.32, 136.11, and 108.09 mg/dl, respectively. Arcus cornealis was seen in 55.31% of patients with potential FH, 90% in definite FH, and 44.40% with probable FH. Patients with potential FH were more likely to be younger (age < 40 years) males, having a history of CAD and a family history of premature CAD as compared to patients without FH.

Conclusions

There was no previous report of large studies on FH or its epidemiology and its natural history from India. The present study is the first one to show a high prevalence of potential FH in premature CAD (about 23.5%). This preliminary study revealed that the prevalence of FH in patients with premature CAD who came to the tertiary care hospital of Ranchi, Jharkhand, was high, apart from the conventional risk factors.

Background

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an under-diagnosed autosomal co-dominant genetic disorder characterized by very high plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), xanthomas, arcus cornealis (AC), and premature coronary artery disease (CAD). Tendon xanthomata (TX) are widely regarded as a specific physical sign, but are often absent and may be difficult to assess. FH increases the risk of early CAD by up to 20-fold [1, 2]. It is the most common monogenic disorder leading to premature CAD and cardiac death.

Among patients with CAD or other atherosclerotic diseases, the frequency of FH is significantly higher than that of the general population showing that these patients are at particularly elevated risk of recurrent events [3]. In different ethnic groups across the USA, the prevalence of FH varies [4] and less than 10% of individuals with FH were diagnosed [5, 6]. The estimated prevalence of heterozygous FH (HeFH) is widely variable from 1/200 to 1/500 which contributes to its diagnostic difficulty [7, 8], and homozygous FH (HoFH) is 1/106 in the general population in the west [1]. There are very little data in India about the prevalence of FH. FH is primarily caused by mutations in the gene encoding the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR). Less frequent mutations in the APOB and PCSK9 genes have similar functional consequences [9].

The Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criterion has been used extensively to identify the HeFH phenotype, which is based on LDL-C level, family history of FH, presence of tendon xanthoma, and arcus cornealis. Diagnosis of FH is a key factor in the prevention as this would lead to early recognition of FH in a family member of the index case and in preventing the morbidity and mortality due to CAD by lifestyle modification and judicial usage of hypolipidemic drugs.

The most efficient method of cascade testing for FH is to look for genotyping to relatives of index patients with an identified mutation, but it is in its infancy at the present situation in India. This is better than using family cholesterol testing alone as it is nonspecific [10].

The underdiagnosis of FH in the general population has been recognized as an important issue. For many patients, unaware of the disease, the first clinical manifestation may be acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The number of large-scale studies of FH or its epidemiology and natural history reported from India is close to nil. Although many studies have been conducted in India to study the lipid profile in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), there has been little mention of FH in these publications. There are huge gaps among Asian countries about the knowledge, frequency of occurrence, and care of FH. To fill this gap, it was aimed to assess the prevalence of FH in patients with premature coronary artery disease.

Methods

This study was conducted on 200 patients of premature CAD, who were admitted to the Ward/CCU of the Department of Cardiology RIMS, Ranchi, Jharkhand, from January 2020 to June 2021 with CAG-confirmed acute coronary syndrome (ACS). ACS is defined as severe chest pain or equivalent ischemic discomfort (dyspnea and epigastric discomfort) and has at least one of three features: (1) It occurs at rest (or with minimal exertion) lasting for more than 10 min. (2) It is of recent onset (i.e., within the prior 2 weeks), and/or (3) it occurs with a crescendo (upsurge) pattern.

Sample size calculation

Based on clinical experience and study of the literature, the prevalence of the FH in premature CAD was expected to be about 15%. The sample size was calculated with a 5% margin of error and a 5% level of significance. The required minimum sample size was found to be 180 as per the following formula.

Formula used:

$$n = Z^{2}_{\alpha /2} \,pq/d^{2}$$

p is the expected prevalence of Familial hypercholesterolemia in patients of premature coronary artery disease and:

$$q = 1 - p$$

d is the margin of error.

Zα/2 is the ordinate of standard normal distribution at α/2% level of significance.

Inclusion criteria

Patients of premature CAD with age 45 years or less for males and age less than 55 years for females based on the study by van Loon et al. [11].

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with advanced liver/kidney disease.

  • Pregnant and lactating women.

  • Patients with hypothyroidism.

  • Patients with cancer

Study methodology

Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study.

Data collection

The following data were collected:

  • Demographics: name, age, gender, address, etc.

  • Clinical history and risk factors for coronary artery diseases.

  • A family history of premature coronary artery diseases, high LDL-C, and tendon xanthomas.

  • A physical examination of the patient was carried out to look for clinical features of FH such as hypercholesterolemia, tendon xanthomas, arcus cornealis, coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, and cerebrovascular artery disease.

  • Blood sample for serum lipid profile was collected at the time of admission either in fasting or nonfasting state, and blood sample was sent for biochemical analysis in the department of Biochemistry of RIMS hospital, Ranchi, Jharkhand. The LDL cholesterol was estimated according to the clearance method followed by the enzymatic method (cholesterol oxidase peroxidase method). Total cholesterol, VLDL, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides were also estimated.

  • Patients were diagnosed as clinical FH according to the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria (Table 1) which incorporate clinical history, physical examination, family history, and LDL-C level.

Table 1 The Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria
Full size table

Method of study

The patients with confirmed CAD on coronary angiography were enrolled. Demographic details, clinical history, family history, and treatment history were taken. Physical stigmata of familial hypercholesterolemia like arcus cornealis and tendon xanthoma were examined. Lipid profile was estimated and for a patient on regular cholesterol-lowering medication in whom a pre-treatment LDL-C was not available, and an estimate of untreated LDL-C was obtained by multiplying the measured LDL-C by the validated LDL-C correction factor. Then according to DLCN criteria (Table 1), patients were divided into definite FH, probable FH, possible FH, and no FH groups. This was followed by an analysis of data among the different groups.

Data analysis

Descriptive statistics were analyzed with SPSS version 17.0 software. Continuous variables were presented as mean +/− SD. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Association between two categorical variables was done using Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test.

Results

A total of 200 premature CAD patients were included from the OPD/wards/CCU of the Cardiology department of RIMS hospital at Ranchi, Jharkhand. Among the premature CAD patients, 77% were male and the rest were female. In the present study, genetic testing was not carried out by DNA sequencing of candidate genes (LDLR, APOB, PCSK9) and thus premature CAD patients were classified as definite, probable, possible, or no FH (familial hypercholesterolemia) patients only using the most effective DLCN (Dutch Lipid Clinic Network) criteria. The prevalence of different categories present in this study calculated by DLCN criteria points can be summarized in the following pie chart (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Pie diagram shows the relative percentage of occurrence of different types of familial hypercholesterolemia as classified using the most effective DLCN (Dutch Lipid Clinic Network) criteria because genetic testing was not done by DNA sequencing of candidate genes (LDLR, APOB, PCSK9) in this study

Full size image

Definite familial hypercholesterolemia in patients with premature CAD was 5.5%, while the prevalence of potential FH [combined definite + probable FH (18%) was 23.5% and the prevalence of possible FH was 26.0% (Table 2).

Table 2 Prevalence of potential, possible, and no FH
Full size table

The mean age of patients was 40.78 years at the time of enrollment in the hospital, but for patients with definite FH, the same was 35.06 ± 5.64 years, which was younger and statistically significant than other FH categories (Table 3).

Table 3 Mean age of FH patients
Full size table

Relatively nonspecific diagnostic sign of AC (Arcus cornealis) was present only in 13% (26) of patients with premature CAD, but among potential FH patients, the incidence of AC was fairly high about 55.31% (26/47) (p value < 0.00001) and within definite FH group it was almost 90%.Untreated LDL-C levels from 155 to 189 mg/dL in 18.21% of patients and 190–249 mg/dL in 10% of patients were detected. Coronary angiography showed ~ 36% and 34% of patients having a single (SVD)- and double-vessel disease (DVD), respectively, while TVD was reported in less number of patients (~ 28%). Almost 49% were having a positive family history of premature CAD and 58 (29.0%) patients were smokers. A comorbidity symptom like diabetes was high (42%) as compared to hypertension (28%) in the premature CAD patients. The correlation of these two comorbidities cannot be correlated with the FH-related premature CAD incidence (Tables 4, 5).

Table 4 Frequency of diabetes in FH with CAD patients
Full size table
Table 5 Frequency of hypertension in FH patients
Full size table

A positive correlation of FH can be drawn with patients having a positive family history of premature CAD (Table 6).

Table 6 Frequency of patients having a positive family history of premature CAD
Full size table

Details of all the baseline characteristics of the patients are grouped in Table 7.

Table 7 Baseline characteristics
Full size table

The majority of the definite FH group were male patients (10 out of 11), and the comparative age group distribution of different FH groups showed that 81.81% of definite FH belong to the less than 40 years of age cluster (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The relative percentage of premature CAD patients that were classified by using the most effective DLCN (Dutch Lipid Clinic Network) criteria grouped into two age categories. The less than 40 years of age group showed more prevalence in definite and possible FH types

Full size image

A statistically significant positive correlation of FH can also be drawn with patients with different levels of LDL-C concentration. Mean concentrations of LDL-C among patients with definite FH, probable FH, possible FH, and no FH group was 250.39 ± 39.88, 184.32 ± 23.41, 136.11 ± 79.72, and 108.09 ± 12.72.72, respectively (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The relation of the presence of mean LDL-C concentration in blood plasma with different types of FH patient groups. The maximum concentration was found in definite FH, and the minimum concentration was found who had no FH detected by DLCN criteria. This finding very well relates the increase in LDL-C directly related to the FH occurrence in premature CAD patients

Full size image

Coronary angiography findings: Among patients with premature CAD with FH, single-vessel disease (SVD) was more common in probable FH and possible FH groups than in definite FH. Multi-vessel disease (DVD/TVD) was more frequent in the potential FH group (72.34%) than in the possible FH group (51.92%) (p < 0.00001) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Multi-colored bar diagram showing more occurrences of DVD in definite FH and TVD in probable FH patients, while patients with no FH had an almost equal probability of developing SVD, DVD, and TVD

Full size image

Discussion

This is the first study to estimate the prevalence of FH in premature coronary artery disease in Jharkhand and may be the first study to address the issue of a large number of patients in India. The diagnosis of FH in patients with premature CAD has been under-recognized throughout India. The present study shows that FH is common in patients with premature coronary artery disease, and it is relatively easily diagnosed clinically without the aid of a genetic screening process.

Out of 200 premature CAD patients attended either in the OPD or wards or CCU of the Department of Cardiology, RIMS, Ranchi, females and males were 46 (23%) and 154 (77.0%) in number, respectively. The mean age of patients was 40.78 ± 6.95 years; the mean age of female and male patients was 47.48 years and 38.64 years, respectively. This ratio showed that the onset age of CAD occurs earlier in male patients than in female patients in Jharkhand. Different types of FH as classified by clinical observations as directed by DLCN criteria were shown to have different percentages of the previous history of CAD in patients in the population of Jharkhand, i.e., 18.18%, 16.70%, 11.30%, and 5.36% patients had a history of the previous CAD in patients diagnosed with definite FH, probable FH, possible FH, and no FH, respectively. It was also observed that 8.5% of the total 200 early CAD patients had a history of dyslipidemia.

The present study showed a high prevalence of FH in premature CAD as compared to previous studies in different parts of the world, based on clinical scoring systems according to DLCN criteria. The prevalence of definite familial hypercholesterolemia was 5.5%, and probable FH was 18.0% in patients with premature coronary artery disease. The prevalence of possible FH was 26.0%, which was fairly high compared to the theoretically estimated percentage of prevalence of heterozygous FH (1/500). The present study showed that the prevalence of potential FH (combining both definite and probable FH) is 23.5% which was even higher than 12.3% as reported by Dorsch et al. [12] among 404 patients of ACS surveyed.

A similar trend of lesser FH was also reported from Singapore by Yudi et al. [13] that included 210 premature CAD patients in the Gold Coast Hospital for 12 months and got 0% definite FH, 1% (3) probable FH, 24% (50) possible FH patients, and 60 (29%) had unlikely FH. The prevalence of FH was very low as compared to the present study. Gaudet et al. [14] reported a genetically confirmed prevalence of 16.4% FH including LPL-C deficient patients among 412 French Canadian men of less than 60 years of age. We report here a prevalence of 23.5% potential FH in premature CAD patients among the population of Ranchi, Jharkhand. Faggiano et al. [15] from Australia studied 175 patients admitted to a coronary care unit with CAD at age < 60 years. Based on modified phenotypic DLCN criteria, the estimated prevalence of probable/definite FH in early onset CAD was 14.3% (95% confidence interval).

In the present study, angiography revealed FH patients with premature CAD exhibited more SVD in the probable (33.33%) and possible (48.07%) FH group than in the definite FH (9%) group. Among multi-vessel diseases, DVD and TVD were more frequent in the potential FH group (23.70% and 31.57%) than in the possible FH group (20.58% and 22.80).

Limitations

Our present study has several limitations. Firstly, the lipid measurements were performed in different laboratories. An inter-laboratory variation could have conditioned the prevalence of potential FH. Secondly, there were patients in whom the “untreated LDL-C levels” were not measured but estimated using a validated correction formula, and lastly, genetic analysis was not performed in potential FH patients to confirm the diagnosis.

Conclusions

The present study is the first one to show a high prevalence of FH in premature CAD (about 23.5% for potential FH). To the best of our knowledge, there were no reported large studies of FH or its epidemiology and natural history from Indian patients. Many studies in India have been carried out to study the lipid profile of acute coronary syndrome in Indian patients, but there has been little mention of FH in these publications. Only one previous study, which described clinical profiles and treatment patterns of 997 patients with premature CAD, just briefly mentioned that there was a 1.3% prevalence of possible FH in the study population. This preliminary study revealed that the prevalence of FH in patients with premature CAD who came to the tertiary care hospital of Ranchi, Jharkhand, was high, apart from the conventional risk factors.

Availability of data and materials

All the raw data and materials mentioned in this manuscript were kept unaffectedly to be produced before the publishing authority, if required.

Abbreviations

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

FH:

Familial hypercholesterolemia

DVD:

Double-vessel disease

TVD:

Triple-vessel disease

SVD:

Single-vessel disease

DLCN:

Dutch Lipid Clinic Network

ACS:

Acute coronary syndrome

OPD:

Outpatient department

CCU:

Critical care unit

LDL:

Low-density lipoprotein

VLDL:

Very low-density lipoprotein

HDL:

High-density lipoprotein

AC:

Arcus cornealis

RIMS:

Rajendra Institute of Medical Science

CAG:

Coronary artery angiography

HeFH:

Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

HoFH:

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

APOB:

Apolipoprotein B

PCSK9:

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9

References

  1. Nordestgaard BG, Chapman MJ, Humphries SE, Ginsberg HN et al (2013) Familial hypercholesterolemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease: consensus statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J 34:3478–3490. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldberg AC, Hopkins PN, Toth PP, Ballantyne CM, Rader DJ, Robinson JG et al (2011) Familial hypercholesterolemia: screening, diagnosis, and management of pediatric and adult patients: clinical guidance from the national lipid association expert panel on familial hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Lipidol 5:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacl.2011.04.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Backer GD, Besseling J, Chapman J, Hovingh GK, Kastelein JJ, Kotseva K et al (2015) Prevalence and management of familial hypercholesterolemia in coronary patients: an analysis of EUROASPIRE IV, a study of the European Society of Cardiology. Atherosclerosis 241:169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.04.809

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shah NP, Ahmed HM, Wilson Tang WH (2020) Familial hypercholesterolemia: detect, treat, and ask about family. Cleve Clin J Med 87(2):109–120. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.87a.19021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mundal L, Retterstøl K (2016) A systematic review of current studies in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia by use of national familial hypercholesterolemia registries. Curr Opin Lipidol 27(4):388–397. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOL.0000000000000300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Myers KD, Knowles JW, Staszak D et al (2019) Precision screening for familial hypercholesterolemia: a machine learning study applied to electronic health encounter data. Lancet Digit Health 1(8):e393–e402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30150-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lui DTW, Lee ACH, Tan KCB (2021) Management of familial hypercholesterolemia: current status and future perspectives. J Endocr Soc 5(1):bvaa122. https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaa122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Khera AV, Hegele RA (2020) What is familial hypercholesterolemia, and why does it matter? Circulation 141(22):1760–1763. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Austin MA, Hutter CM, Zimmern RL, Humphries SE (2004) Genetic causes of monogenic heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: a HuGE prevalence review. Am J Epidemiol 160:407–420. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Datta BN, McDowell IF, Rees A (2010) Integrating provision of specialist lipid services with cascade testing for familial hypercholesterolemia. Curr Opin Lipidol 21:366–371. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOL.0b013e32833c14e2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. van Loon JE, de Maat MP, Deckers JW, van Domburg RT, Leebeek FW (2012) Prognostic markers in young patients with premature coronary heart disease. Atherosclerosis 224(1):213–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.06.067

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dorsch MF, Lawrence RA, Durham NP, Hall AS (2001) Familial hypercholesterolemia is under-diagnosed after acute myocardial infarction. BMJ 322:111–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yudi M, Omera L, McCubbery N, Dick S, Jayasinghe R, Hamilton CI (2012) Suboptimal consideration and management of potential familial hypercholesterolemia in patients with suspected premature coronary artery disease. Singapore Med J 53:174–178

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gaudet D, Vohl MC, Julien P, Tremblay G, Perron P, Gagne C et al (1998) Relative contribution of low-density lipoprotein receptor and lipoprotein lipase gene mutations to angiographically assessed coronary artery disease among French Canadians. J Cardiol 1998(82):299–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00328-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Faggiano P, Pirillo A, Griffo R, Ambrosetti M, Pedretti R, Scorcu G et al (2018) Prevalence and management of familial hypercholesterolemia in patients with coronary artery disease: the heredity survey. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 252:193–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.10.105

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to the Department of Cardiology, RIMS Hospital, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India, for providing with the participants and diagnosis facilities for this research work.

Funding

The present work was not supported by any departmental research grant or any Government organizations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology, RIMS Hospital, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

    Prakash Kumar, Shashi Ranjan Prasad & Rajneesh Kumar

  2. Department of Zoology, Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee University, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

    Anushil Anand & Sajalendu Ghosh

Authors
  1. Prakash Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shashi Ranjan Prasad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anushil Anand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rajneesh Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sajalendu Ghosh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SR, RK, and PK analyzed and interpreted the patient data. AA took the data and consent letter of the patients, and SG was a key contributor in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prakash Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The work was conducted within the department of cardiology, Rajendra Institute of Medical Science, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India, and the ethical committee report was taken from the same Hospital’s Ethical Committee. Filled up consent form with signature of patients was taken.

Consent for publication

Written consent for publication of the data from each of the study participants was also taken.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, P., Prasad, S.R., Anand, A. et al. Prevalence of familial hypercholesterolemia in patients with confirmed premature coronary artery disease in Ranchi, Jharkhand. Egypt Heart J 74, 83 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43044-022-00320-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43044-022-00320-7

Keywords